Archive for the ‘Buying’ Category

October
26th
2011

Moving & taking the stress out of the move

The stress associated with moving is drastically reduced with careful planning. If you fail to plan you plan to fail, regardless of how far you’re planning to go. These handy tips will help is run smoothly.

It’s possible a move ‘around the corner’ could be more stressful than a move interstate if it hasn’t been planned properly.

Start planning your move as soon as possible. It’s generally more appropriate to divide your moving plan into timeframes. Remember this helps because there will always be delays so it’s best to prepared and build this into your plans.

Confirm your moving date and work backwards. Think in terms of time chunks:

  • Three months to go
  • Two months to go
  • One month to go
  • Two weeks to go
  • The day of the move

A number of reputable removalist companies have excellent planning services to assist you and organisations, such as the Australian Furniture Removers’ Association, (AFRA) also offer invaluable advice – especially with regard to commonly asked questions, and what you should expect from a moving company.

Cheers

Chris Gilmour
www.chrisgilmour.com.au

June
27th
2011

New Stamp Duty to play havoc with Market

There is no doubt when purchasing a home buyers are going to be concerned about the amount of stamp duty they will have to pay when purchasing, and we believe they will start using this during the negoation period with the vendors, so it will be interesting to see if this plays out like this or not.

 

Here is a table of what the new stamp duty is going to be from 1st August 2011

Upto $5000 – NIL

$5000-$105,000 – $1.50 for each $100, or part of $100, over $5,000

$105,000 – $480,000 – $1,500 + $3.50 for each $100 or part of $100, over $105,000

$480,000-$980,000 – $14625 + $4.50 for each $100 or part of $100, over $480,000

More than $980,000 = $37,125 + $5.25 for each $100 or part of $100, over $980,000

so there you have it, this is what is about to happen. Me personally am not a fan of this and will be interesting to see how the market reacts to this also.

 

December
17th
2010

Overvalued house prices will correct without crash

AUSTRALIA’S house prices are over-valued by 5 per cent to 10 per cent but any correction is ”likely to be orderly” and the result of income and rent rises rather than a collapse in prices, says the International Monetary Fund.

Analysis of house prices by the IMF found cyclical factors such as low interest rates, the commodities boom and disposable income levels contributed to inflated house prices, but their over-valuation appeared milder than in the past.

Price-to-income ratios – the proportion of income spent on housing costs – was high, above 10-year averages by about 20 per cent at the end of June, the fund’s working paper said.

In Canada similar ratios were at 15 per cent and in New Zealand they were at 26 per cent.

These ratios were good indicators of over-valuation in countries such as Ireland that subsequently experienced a correction, the paper said.

By comparison, Ireland at the peak of its boom in 2006 had a house price-to-income ratio of 40 per cent. Since then real prices had declined by 35 per cent.

But while overvalued prices suggests some adjustment might be required, the IMF said high house values could be balanced by incomes and rents growing faster than house prices, migration and changes in terms of trade.

”Thus, a decline in house prices is only one way for the adjustment to occur, and the correction required in prices can occur gradually,” it said.

The analysis is similar to views expressed by Commonwealth Bank and Westpac that house prices, while overvalued, are unlikely to lead to a collapse.

Preliminary results of a stress test on Australian banks’ mortgages by Fitch Ratings found they could handle a worst-case loan default scenario.

Real income growth after record-high commodity prices this year would also help to close the house price gap, the report said.

The report noted that increasing scarcity of land in urban centres and the constraints on development from growth corridors and urban boundaries was a price factor. ”The fact that such a high proportion of Australia’s population live in two major centres tends to drive up average house prices,” the report said.

A 1 per cent increase in the working-age population as a share of total population will raise house prices by about 4 per cent because of supply constraints, it said. The wealth effect from the sharp increase in terms of trade has also pushed up house prices, as has high household disposable income growth.

The report said Australia-specific mitigating factors suggested that any correction in house prices was likely to be orderly.

Banks have shown resilience to a fall in house prices based on stress tests by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority because of a low level of high-risk mortgages.

Strong terms of trade and population growth would continue to support the housing market.

”But the authorities should remain vigilant to emerging risks, given that household debt is relatively high at over 150 per cent of household disposable income,” the report warned.

Simon Johanson

December 17, 2010

December
16th
2010

Brisbane Auction Sell Rate is at 22% – So why sell at Auction?

Auction markets continue to show significant weakness with the weighted average capital city auction clearance rate recorded at 50.9% last week, the lowest clearance rate since the end of January this year.

Although clearance rates indicate that only around half of all auctions will sell under the hammer there was still almost 2,150 auctions throughout the capital cities last week. In Melbourne, clearance rates improved slightly up to 56.2% last week from 54.8% the previous week. Sydney’s auction clearance rate fell to 53.1% from 53.8% the previous week.

The number of newly advertised rental properties increased by 4.6% last week and is now 11.5% higher than the 12 month average.

As a result of the increase in new advertisements, the total number of rental listings has also increased but by a lower 2.3%. Total rental advertisements are 4.2% above the 12 month averagAcross the combined capital cities, auction clearance rates have been trending lower since the middle of April of this year.

The downwards trend in auction clearance rates foreshadowed the cooling in capital gains across the residential markets, with the RP Data-Rismark Home Value Index showing that capital city home values started falling about a month and half later.

Despite the fact that clearance rates have been easing since April, the volume of properties being taken to auction has been substantial. Auction clearance rates most recently peaked at 75% during the week ending 18 April 2010.

Since that time, there has been more than 45,000 capital city properties taken to auction. The volume of properties going to auction since that time to the week ending 7 November 2010 is greater than the volume of auctions undertaken between the corresponding week last year and the end of 2009, highlighting that auction activity this year has been greater than last year.

Given this, the question must be asked, why are so many people taking their properties to auction at a time when there are fewer buyers, more properties available for sale, falling auction clearance rates and slowing levels of property value growth?

An auction generally achieves much greater exposure than a private treaty sale as vendors are typically willing to spend more money on advertising. Also, some people suggest that an auction is the best way to achieve top dollar; if you look at the most expensive sales each week across the country, these have usually been taken to auction.

On the flipside of the argument, with clearance rates recorded at just 52% over the last week, the odds of selling a home at auction have slimmed markedly compared to the same time last year. Of course, many unsuccessful auctions are later sold through direct negotiations with the bidders, however the slowdown in the auction market is likely to prompt more vendors to consider alternative selling methods such as tenders and private treaty.

Although nationally auction clearance rates were recorded at 52% last week, the larger auction markets of Melbourne and Sydney are recording a superior performance, but only just. Melbourne’s auction clearance rate peaked during the week ending 11 April 2010 at 85%, last week it recorded a clearance rate of 55%. Sydney’s clearance rate peaked at 83% during the week ending 31 January 2010, last week the city recorded a clearance rate of 54%.

Looking at data which details the number of properties advertised for sale by auction as a proportion of total properties advertised for sale shows that typically, auctions are becoming a more popular way of selling a property. This is likely due to the strong auction clearance rate environment during the second half of 2009 and early 2010.

As a proportion of total listings, Melbourne (41.1%), Canberra (35.5%) and Sydney (28.9%) are by far the most popular markets for auctions. Five years ago, auction listings accounted for just 30.9% of all Melbourne listings and 15.5% of all Canberra listings meanwhile, although the proportion of auction listings in Sydney has increased it has not been as significant as that recorded within the other two cities.

Outside of these three cities, auction markets are relatively minor and account for less than 15% of total listings. Also, whilst the proportion of auction listings has ramped up within Sydney, Melbourne and Canberra, the other capital cities have recorded relatively minimal change in the proportion of listings over the last five years.

Not surprisingly all of the most significant auction markets are located within areas close to the centre of capital cities and dominated by regions with unique and expensive properties. As the table details, these regions record a much greater volume of properties being taken to auction than the total across the capital cities.

Overall, the property market has been performing quite well for much of the last 12 months and given this it is no real surprise to see that auctions have been a popular method of sale. With more stock now available for sale and fewer buyers it may be the case that more vendors will look at alternative selling methods.

Vendors who prefer to stay with the auction process need to be realistic in their reserve prices and have a backup plan in case the auction is unsuccessful. This would normally involve direct negotiations with the highest bidder or other bidders and potentially a secondary marketing campaign focused on a private treaty or tender sale.

* RP Data Research does not suggest one method of sale over another but in these tougher market conditions vendors must choose their method of sale carefully and look to differentiate their property from the rest.

November
16th
2010

E is for Equity: Return on Investment or Return on Equity?

Check out the latest instalment from  resident Property Professor, Peter Koulizos.

There are many ways to measure a profit but the two most commonly used are Return on Investment (ROI) and Return on Equity (ROE).

A Return on Investment (ROI) calculation is based on all the money that has gone into a project, which generally includes your money and the bank’s money. For example, let’s assume you had a $50,000 deposit and took out a loan from the bank for another $450,000 to buy a property for $500,000. If you sold that property in 12 months time for $550,000, it can be said that you made a ROI of 10%. This is because your profit of $50,000 is 10% of the $500,000, which is the total of all the money invested.

A Return on Equity (ROE) calculation is based only on the money you put it into the project. If we use the example above it could be said that you made a profit of 100%. This is because you made an extra $50,000, which is 100% of the $50,000 you put into the property.

Some property spruikers/marketers will try and lure you into a deal by quoting Return on Equity calculations. You can imagine many people would jump at the chance to make 100% on their money. Simply put in $50,000 of your money and then 12 months later you get your $50,000 back plus another $50,000 profit. Sounds great! Or does it….

It is not as simple as putting in $50,000 of your own money and then receiving a 100% profit in 12 months time. Who do you think is responsible for the $450,000 bank loan? You are!

An astute investor will consider the Return on Investment calculation as the most important. A profit based on all the money invested is the best guide as it takes into consideration all the risks.

Happy House Hunting!